{"id":22304,"date":"2025-11-24T13:56:28","date_gmt":"2025-11-24T13:56:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/investx.fr\/en\/?p=22304"},"modified":"2025-11-24T13:56:29","modified_gmt":"2025-11-24T13:56:29","slug":"are-quantum-computers-a-real-threat-to-bitcoin","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/investx.fr\/en\/crytpo-news\/are-quantum-computers-a-real-threat-to-bitcoin\/","title":{"rendered":"Are quantum computers a real threat to Bitcoin?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Bitcoin Cryptography vs. Quantum Computers<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Bitcoin<\/strong> relies on the ECC (Elliptic Curve Cryptography) asymmetric encryption algorithm to secure transactions and protect users’ private keys. This technology, considered unbreakable by classical computers, could be compromised by a sufficiently powerful quantum computer<\/strong>. Shor’s algorithm, specifically designed for quantum computing, would theoretically solve the elliptic curve discrete logarithm problem in significantly reduced time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In concrete terms, a quantum computer equipped with several million stable qubits<\/strong> could derive a private key from an exposed public key. This vulnerability particularly concerns reused Bitcoin<\/a> addresses<\/strong> or those that have made at least one outgoing transaction. Addresses that have never sent funds remain relatively protected because their public key is not revealed on the blockchain<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The crypto community is closely monitoring announcements from tech giants like Google and IBM. Google’s Willow processor, recently unveiled, represents a significant advancement in quantum error correction. However, we are still far from the capabilities needed to concretely threaten Bitcoin.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Post-Quantum Solutions Under Development<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Facing this threat, blockchain developers are already working on signature protocols resistant to quantum computers<\/strong>. Notably SPHINCS+, standardized by NIST, as well as solutions based on Euclidean lattices like CRYSTALS-Dilithium or error-correcting codes. These technologies offer theoretical resistance to quantum attacks while remaining compatible with a public blockchain<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The main obstacle lies in implementation. Migrating Bitcoin<\/a> to post-quantum cryptography would require a consensual hard fork, a long and complex process. The most optimistic projections suggest 5 to 10 years<\/strong> between community decision and global deployment. Meanwhile, experts diverge: some estimate that a quantum computer capable of breaking ECC-256<\/strong> could emerge within 10 to 15 years<\/strong>, while others consider this scenario much more distant.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The limiting factor remains qubit stability and error correction<\/strong>, as current machines suffer from too much decoherence to represent a real threat. Despite this, the Bitcoin community is already advancing BIPs integrating hybrid signatures combining ECC and post-quantum cryptography, a proactive strategy to avoid a crisis if a quantum breakthrough occurred sooner than expected.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

Et si, demain matin, en te r\u00e9veillant, ton Bitcoin ne valait plus rien ?

Pas \u00e0 cause d\u2019un bug ou de la r\u00e9gulation.

Mais \u00e0 cause d'une technologie qui pourrait briser son code et sa s\u00e9curit\u00e9 :

L'informatique quantique.

D\u00e9couvrez en quoi la confrontation entre le Bitcoin contre\u2026
pic.twitter.com\/KrjILGxWKG<\/a><\/p>— Goku \ud83d\uddde (@Crypto__Goku) September 21, 2025<\/a><\/blockquote>