{"id":26882,"date":"2026-02-25T15:55:36","date_gmt":"2026-02-25T15:55:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/investx.fr\/en\/?p=26882"},"modified":"2026-02-25T15:55:38","modified_gmt":"2026-02-25T15:55:38","slug":"ripple-xrp-centralization-accusations","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/investx.fr\/en\/crypto-news\/ripple-xrp-centralization-accusations\/","title":{"rendered":"Ripple centralization Claims: XRP Ledger controversy explained"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
The debate was reignited by critics pointing to the early days of the XRP<\/a> Ledger (XRPL)<\/strong>. The detractors’ argument rests on a technical peculiarity: the ledger’s history doesn’t begin at block 1, but at block 32,570, following a bug that occurred during the first week of launch. For some Bitcoin<\/a> maximalists, this “missing history” is irrefutable proof of centralized and opaque management.<\/p>\n\n\n\n