{"id":30483,"date":"2026-06-27T13:02:58","date_gmt":"2026-06-27T12:02:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/investx.fr\/en\/2026\/06\/27\/bitcoin-etf-outflows-1-79-billion-second-largest\/"},"modified":"2026-06-27T13:03:01","modified_gmt":"2026-06-27T12:03:01","slug":"bitcoin-etf-outflows-1-79-billion-second-largest","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/investx.fr\/en\/crypto-news\/bitcoin-etf-outflows-1-79-billion-second-largest\/","title":{"rendered":"Bitcoin ETFs Record $1.79 Billion in Outflows in One Week \u2014 Second Largest Since Launch"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

US spot Bitcoin ETFs<\/strong> just absorbed one of their worst weeks since hitting the market. In just a few days, $1.79 billion<\/strong> exited these financial products, leaving investors facing one central question: is this a technical correction, or a signal of a deeper reversal?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The timing is brutal. Bitcoin<\/strong> briefly dropped to $58,126<\/strong> before attempting a recovery around $60,287<\/strong>, wiping out nearly $150 billion<\/strong> in market capitalization across the broader crypto market<\/strong> in the process. Nerves are clearly frayed, and ETF flows are the most accurate reflection of that anxiety.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Behind these numbers lies a complex market dynamic \u2014 one that blends institutional selling pressure, deteriorating sentiment, and critical support levels that demand close attention.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A Historic Institutional Selloff Putting 2024 Under Pressure<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Since their approval by the SEC<\/strong> in January 2024<\/strong>, US spot Bitcoin ETFs<\/strong> had broadly played the role of a bullish buffer, pulling in billions of dollars within weeks of launch. This week marks a turning point: $1.79 billion in net redemptions<\/strong> over seven days, making it the second largest outflow wave since these products were introduced.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This level of mass disinvestment signals a clear repositioning on the part of institutional players<\/strong>. When big money reduces its exposure through regulated vehicles like ETFs<\/strong>, it sends a strong signal about their short-term risk perception. The correlation with Bitcoin<\/a> falling below $60,000<\/strong> is no coincidence \u2014 it illustrates the feedback loop between ETF flows and spot market price action.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Massive<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

It is worth putting this figure in context: the first record outflow wave was recorded during an episode of sharp macroeconomic volatility. The fact that this new peak is occurring in an environment where interest rates<\/strong> remain elevated and risk appetite is eroding suggests that the selling pressure is not purely technical \u2014 it is also fundamental.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Bitcoin Below $60,000: Key Levels to Watch After the Capitulation<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Bitcoin<\/strong>‘s plunge to $58,126<\/strong> temporarily broke a major psychological support level that many traders had been watching for several weeks. This level corresponds to a historically significant demand zone, and its breach to the downside \u2014 however brief \u2014 triggered a cascade of liquidations and amplified selling pressure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The bounce toward $60,287<\/strong> offers some relief, but does not yet constitute a confirmed recovery. On the technical side, on-chain indicators<\/a> are showing an increase in transfers to exchanges, a sign that some short-term holders are looking to exit their positions. The $58,000 to $59,500<\/strong> range now represents a critical support zone: a return below this floor would reopen the path toward $55,000<\/strong>, or even $52,000<\/strong> according to several dynamic support models.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To the upside, Bitcoin<\/strong> will need to reclaim and consolidate above $62,000 to $63,000<\/strong> in order to neutralize the short-term bearish pressure and restore confidence among institutional buyers. As long as ETF flows remain negative and market sentiment stays depressed, every bounce risks being sold into. The next week of flow data will be decisive in determining whether this selloff represents a peak in panic selling or the beginning of a more sustained disinvestment trend.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Related articles :<\/h3>\n\n\n\n