{"id":30891,"date":"2026-07-21T17:45:14","date_gmt":"2026-07-21T16:45:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/investx.fr\/en\/2026\/07\/21\/clarity-act-us-senate-historic-crypto-deal\/"},"modified":"2026-07-21T17:45:22","modified_gmt":"2026-07-21T16:45:22","slug":"clarity-act-us-senate-historic-crypto-deal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/investx.fr\/en\/crypto-news\/clarity-act-us-senate-historic-crypto-deal\/","title":{"rendered":"Clarity Act: U.S. Senate on the Verge of a Historic Crypto Deal"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

The U.S. crypto regulatory framework has never been closer to becoming law. Republican Senator Kevin Cramer<\/strong> says the Clarity Act<\/strong> is “almost there,” as negotiators put the finishing touches on a final round of amendments ahead of a vote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Behind this progress lie complex trade-offs: who enforces the law, how to define securities intermediaries<\/strong>, and perhaps most critically, how to handle conflicts of interest tied to crypto assets held by elected officials<\/strong>. The coming weeks will be decisive for the entire market.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A vote before the congressional August recess<\/strong>? That’s the stated goal \u2014 and markets have been waiting for this signal of regulatory clarity<\/strong> for years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A Deal in Sight, But the Details Are Still Being Debated<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Senator Kevin Cramer<\/strong>, a member of the Senate Banking Committee<\/strong>, told Fox Business<\/strong> that the Clarity Act<\/strong> is gaining clarity “as each issue gets resolved.” A new package of amendments \u2014 including provisions on ethics \u2014 has been sent to Democrats for review. The main obstacle, according to Cramer, is simply the time needed to read through them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The central sticking point remains which body will be responsible for enforcing the law<\/strong>. Cramer indicated that a consensus is forming around the Department of Justice (DOJ)<\/strong> as the “primary enforcer” \u2014 a structure he supports as a way to guarantee uniform rules at the federal level. Democrats had initially pushed for a role for state attorneys general<\/strong>, an approach Cramer considers too fragmented to deliver the clarity the industry is demanding.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A second point of contention involves the definition of securities intermediaries<\/strong>. The crypto industry<\/a> objects to the current wording and would prefer a definition grounded in the concept of decentralization<\/strong>. Cramer has downplayed these remaining disagreements, calling them “small details” \u2014 but in financial legislation, the details often make all the difference.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Clarity<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Trump’s Shadow Over the Ethics Negotiations<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Behind the technical debates looms a politically charged question: the conflicts of interest tied to Donald Trump’s crypto holdings<\/strong> and those of his family. Senator Cynthia Lummis<\/strong>, chair of the Subcommittee on Digital Assets<\/strong>, had proposed an amendment that would allow state attorneys general<\/strong> to pursue exchanges<\/a> that list tokens issued by sitting elected officials \u2014 a provision clearly aimed at Trump-linked projects.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Democrats pushed for binding rules on conflicts of interest<\/strong>. An amendment seeking to bar the president, vice president, and members of Congress from any commercial involvement with cryptocurrencies<\/a> was rejected during the committee vote, along strictly partisan lines. Trump<\/strong> himself met with senators in an attempt to defuse the issue.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Cramer<\/strong> compromise \u2014 centralizing enforcement with the DOJ<\/strong> rather than fifty state attorneys general \u2014 mechanically reduces the legal avenues available to challenge the listing of a token tied to an elected official. It is as much a political trade-off as a legal one, and it goes a long way toward explaining the persistent Democratic resistance<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A Narrow Window Before the Summer Recess<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The calendar is weighing on negotiations. Cramer believes the Senate has “a few weeks”<\/strong> before the August recess<\/strong> to wrap things up. Lummis<\/strong>, for her part, stated last week that the bill was “ready” and that it was “very important” to get it passed before the summer break \u2014 so that markets could feel “the stability it will bring them if they stay on U.S. soil.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Clarity Act<\/strong> would split oversight of digital assets between the SEC and the CFTC, and establish disclosure requirements across the sector. For market participants \u2014 exchanges<\/strong>, token issuers<\/strong>, DeFi protocols<\/strong> \u2014 this framework represents a way out of the legal vacuum that has been holding back institutional investment for years.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If the bill passes before August, it would send a powerful signal to global markets: the United States<\/strong> is choosing to regulate crypto rather than stifle it. A regulatory pivot that could redefine the competitiveness of the American ecosystem<\/strong> against Europe<\/strong> and Asia<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Related articles :<\/h3>\n\n\n\n