{"id":31207,"date":"2026-08-04T18:37:33","date_gmt":"2026-08-04T17:37:33","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/investx.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/04\/xrp-price-10-dollars-structural-argument\/"},"modified":"2026-08-04T18:37:39","modified_gmt":"2026-08-04T17:37:39","slug":"xrp-price-10-dollars-structural-argument","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/investx.fr\/en\/crypto-news\/xrp-price-10-dollars-structural-argument\/","title":{"rendered":"XRP at $10: The Structural Argument That Goes Far Beyond the Hype"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

A $10 price target for XRP<\/strong> \u2014 no charts, no FOMO, no promises of easy gains. Analyst Jake Claver<\/strong> builds his thesis around an 80-year-old problem that the global financial system has never managed to solve.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

His starting point is not a technical resistance level or a halving cycle. It is the Triffin Dilemma<\/strong>, a structural contradiction at the heart of the international monetary architecture since 1944<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It is an argument that deserves serious examination \u2014 and one that fundamentally changes how you assess the real potential of XRP<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Triffin Dilemma: The Invisible Crack in the Global Monetary System<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Triffin Dilemma<\/strong> describes a fundamental tension: when a national currency simultaneously serves as the global reserve currency<\/strong>, the issuing country must export vast quantities of that currency to supply international liquidity \u2014 at the cost of a chronic trade deficit that undermines its own economy. The US dollar<\/strong> has been the perfect example of this since Bretton Woods<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This architecture creates a systemic dependency: cross-border transactions flow through correspondent banks, settlement delays of 2 to 5 business days<\/strong>, and conversion frictions that cost the global economy hundreds of billions of dollars every year. The SWIFT<\/strong> network, designed in the 1970s, was never built for speed or capital efficiency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This is precisely where Jake Claver<\/strong> positions XRP<\/a>. Not as a speculative asset, but as a neutral liquidity infrastructure<\/strong> \u2014 a bridge between currencies that enables international transactions to settle in 3 to 5 seconds<\/strong> at near-zero cost, without relying on any dominant national currency.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"XRP<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Why $10? The Mechanics Behind the Number<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The $10 per XRP<\/strong> target does not come from a technical screener. It stems from an estimate of the liquidity value that XRP<\/strong> would need to capture in order to fulfil its role as a monetary bridge at a global scale. The reasoning is anchored in the daily volume of cross-border payment flows \u2014 estimated at several trillion dollars per day<\/strong> according to the BIS (Bank for International Settlements)<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For XRP<\/strong> to serve as an intermediate settlement layer for even a fraction of those flows, its market capitalisation would need to reach a level capable of absorbing those volumes without excessive slippage. Based on the current circulating supply of approximately 57 billion XRP<\/strong>, a price of $10 would represent a market cap of around $570 billion. That figure remains below Bitcoin<\/strong>‘s current market cap, but it implies massive institutional adoption from banks and fintech firms alike.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ripple<\/a> has already signed partnerships with more than 300 financial institutions<\/strong> worldwide, including several central banks exploring CBDC<\/strong> solutions. Ripple’s On-Demand Liquidity (ODL)<\/strong> product uses XRP<\/strong> as a real-time bridge asset \u2014 and it is this operational proof of concept that Claver<\/strong> cites to ground his scenario in reality rather than speculation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What This Scenario Requires to Materialise<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The thesis is coherent, but it rests on several conditions that are far from guaranteed. First, full regulatory clarity in the United States<\/strong>: despite Ripple<\/strong>‘s partial legal victory against the SEC<\/strong> in 2023, the legal framework surrounding XRP<\/strong> remains in flux. A definitive classification as a non-security would be a major catalyst for institutional adoption.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Second, real-world ODL<\/strong> adoption needs to accelerate significantly. Today, the volumes processed through this product remain marginal compared to global SWIFT<\/strong> flows. The transition from niche use case to systemic infrastructure requires deep changes in the back-office processes of correspondent banks \u2014 a process measured in years, not quarters.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Finally, XRP<\/strong> faces growing competition: stablecoins<\/a> such as USDC and USDT, along with interbank CBDC<\/strong> projects, are all vying for the same cross-border settlement space. XRP’s differentiation rests on its neutrality \u2014 it is not pegged to any national currency \u2014 but that advantage still needs to be fully recognised by institutional players before it can translate into large-scale adoption.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Related articles :<\/h3>\n\n\n\n