{"id":31291,"date":"2026-08-07T08:49:29","date_gmt":"2026-08-07T07:49:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/investx.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/07\/trump-crypto-bill-conflict-of-interest\/"},"modified":"2026-08-07T08:49:34","modified_gmt":"2026-08-07T07:49:34","slug":"trump-crypto-bill-conflict-of-interest","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/investx.fr\/en\/crypto-news\/trump-crypto-bill-conflict-of-interest\/","title":{"rendered":"US Crypto Bill: Trump’s Digital Asset Holdings Create a Massive Conflict of Interest"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

The long-awaited US crypto regulatory framework is hitting an unexpected wall: President Donald Trump<\/strong>‘s own digital asset holdings. With ethical obligations, enormous financial interests, and mounting political pressure all colliding, the situation is rapidly turning explosive.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

As Congress<\/strong> advances several landmark bills for the crypto industry, serious questions about the executive’s impartiality are emerging as a potential roadblock to any legislative progress. Could American crypto regulation be sacrificed on the altar of conflicts of interest<\/strong>?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Here is a breakdown of a situation that has no precedent in the history of US crypto policy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

A Presidential Crypto Portfolio That Raises Serious Concerns<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Donald Trump holds significant crypto positions, most notably through World Liberty Financial (WLFI)<\/strong> \u2014 a DeFi<\/a><\/strong> platform co-launched with his family \u2014 as well as memecoins bearing his likeness (TRUMP<\/strong> and MELANIA<\/strong>). These assets represent direct financial interests<\/strong> in a sector that the president is uniquely positioned to regulate or deregulate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Democratic lawmakers, including Senator Elizabeth Warren<\/strong>, have formally challenged the administration on this issue. Their argument is straightforward: if Trump signs legislation that benefits stablecoins or eases oversight of DeFi platforms, he stands to gain personally and financially. This type of situation falls squarely within the scope of federal anti-corruption laws<\/strong> and US government ethics rules.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The GENIUS Act<\/strong> (the stablecoin regulatory framework) and the Digital Asset Market Structure Bill<\/strong> are the two pieces of legislation most directly implicated. Both could create favorable market conditions for projects in which Trump is personally involved \u2014 making his role as a potential signatory particularly problematic in the eyes of constitutional law experts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Forced Divestiture or Tax Exemption: Two Scenarios Under Pressure<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Faced with this ethical impasse, two options are circulating in Washington<\/strong>‘s political and legal circles. The first is a mandatory divestiture<\/strong> of Trump’s crypto assets before he signs any sector-specific legislation. This solution, championed by several ethics watchdogs, would eliminate the conflict of interest at its source \u2014 but it faces predictable resistance from the president’s inner circle.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The second option is more surprising: a capital gains tax exemption<\/strong> on the sale of assets disposed of for ethical reasons. This mechanism, which already exists for certain federal officials required to sell stocks upon taking office, would allow Trump to offload his crypto<\/a> holdings without incurring a heavy tax burden. Some observers see it as a pragmatic solution; others view it as yet another tax break for an already controversial president.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Either way, the US crypto industry is being held hostage by the political calendar<\/strong>. Every week of legislative gridlock delays the regulatory clarity that exchanges, stablecoin issuers, and institutional funds have been waiting years for. Players like Coinbase<\/a>, Circle<\/strong>, and Ripple<\/strong> have invested heavily in lobbying to secure this framework \u2014 and are now watching their horizon cloud over for reasons that have nothing to do with technology.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What Is the Real Impact on US Crypto Regulation?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The concrete risk is one of prolonged institutional gridlock<\/strong>. If Trump refuses to divest his assets and Democratic opposition continues to intensify, any crypto legislation he signs could face legal challenges on conflict of interest grounds. That level of legal uncertainty alone would be enough to deter institutional players from accelerating their allocations into assets whose legal status remains disputed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conversely, if an ethical resolution is reached quickly \u2014 whether through divestiture or a tax exemption \u2014 Congress technically has the majority to pass the GENIUS Act<\/strong> and the Market Structure Bill<\/strong> before the end of 2025. Bloomberg Intelligence analysts estimate that the adoption of both bills could inject several hundred billion dollars in additional institutional capital<\/a> into the US crypto ecosystem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The ball is now firmly in the White House<\/strong>‘s court. And the global crypto industry is holding its breath, fully aware that the world’s largest economy is just a handful of political decisions away from either transforming \u2014 or paralyzing \u2014 its market for years to come.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Related articles :<\/h3>\n\n\n\n