{"id":31752,"date":"2026-08-21T13:02:03","date_gmt":"2026-08-21T12:02:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/investx.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/21\/us-treasury-buyback-bitcoin-short-squeeze\/"},"modified":"2026-08-21T13:02:09","modified_gmt":"2026-08-21T12:02:09","slug":"us-treasury-buyback-bitcoin-short-squeeze","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/investx.fr\/en\/crypto-news\/us-treasury-buyback-bitcoin-short-squeeze\/","title":{"rendered":"US Treasury Buybacks: How $14 Billion Triggered a Massive $3.5 Billion Crypto Short Squeeze"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

On August 19<\/strong>, the US Treasury<\/strong> doubled the size of its long-term bond buyback operations. Within hours, Bitcoin<\/strong> surged 25% to break above $77,000<\/strong> \u2014 a two-month high.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The crypto derivatives<\/strong> market absorbed one of the most violent short squeezes<\/strong> in its history: $3.5 billion<\/strong> in leveraged positions liquidated within 24 hours, according to The Kobeissi Letter<\/strong>. Total crypto market capitalization jumped by $280 billion<\/strong> over the same period \u2014 equivalent to $12 billion per hour.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But behind this spectacular rally lies a far more complex mechanism than a straightforward bullish signal. Here is a full breakdown.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

$14 Billion in Buybacks: What the Treasury Actually Announced<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent<\/strong> announced the doubling of buyback operations on 10-year and 30-year bonds<\/strong>, raising each operation to a minimum of $4 billion<\/strong>, up from $2 billion previously. The measure runs from September 9 to November 4<\/strong>, adding at least $14 billion<\/strong> in liquidity support this quarter, with a total ceiling of $83 billion in buybacks over the current window.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The backdrop was heavy: the day before, the yield on the 30-year Treasury had hit 5.34%<\/strong>, its highest level since 2007, amid a global selloff driven by inflation<\/strong> fears, escalating US-Israeli tensions with Iran<\/strong>, and mounting pressure on America’s fiscal trajectory. US total debt<\/strong> crossed the $40 trillion<\/strong> mark on the very day of the announcement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The immediate effect was in line with expectations: the 30-year yield pulled back to 5.184%<\/strong> from its peak, while the 10-year shed around 6 basis points<\/strong> to 4.66%. That was enough to trigger a massive repositioning into risk assets<\/a><\/strong> \u2014 Bitcoin<\/a> included.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Bond<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Historic Short Squeeze: Why the Bears Got Caught Off Guard<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The sudden drop in bond yields<\/strong> instantly shifted liquidity expectations across financial markets. Traders who had been positioned short on Bitcoin<\/strong> \u2014 in an environment where elevated yields had been favoring bonds over speculative assets \u2014 were forced to cover their positions in a rush. This is the classic short squeeze<\/strong> mechanism: the forced price increase triggered by short liquidations amplifies the upward move itself.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to The Kobeissi Letter<\/strong>, this event ranks as the 7th largest liquidation episode in crypto market history<\/strong>. In just 24 hours, $3.5 billion<\/strong> in leveraged positions were wiped out, catapulting Bitcoin<\/strong> from depressed levels to above $77,000<\/strong>. The sheer violence of the move is explained by the buildup of short positions in a market that had been pricing in continued selling pressure on bonds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

One central question remains: is this rally fundamentally justified? Dan Gottlander<\/strong>, global head of USD and CAD swap trading at Citi<\/strong>, warned that the operation does nothing to erase the deficits. “If you buy back the long end, you still have to issue elsewhere \u2014 in short-term T-bills or in the 5-to-10-year segment,”<\/em> he told Reuters<\/strong>. In other words, this is refinancing, not money creation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Treasury Buybacks vs QE: A Confusion That Costs Traders Dearly<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The most widespread misreading within the crypto community is equating these buybacks with quantitative easing (QE)<\/a><\/strong>. The distinction, however, is fundamental. When the Fed<\/strong> purchases bonds under QE, it creates new bank reserves<\/strong> \u2014 that is a net injection of liquidity into the system. Treasury buybacks, by contrast, are funded by issuing new short-term bills to retire older, less liquid bonds. No new money is created<\/strong>: one debt simply replaces another.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conflating the two leads to an overestimation of the actual easing in financial conditions. The bond market itself partially grasped this by the following day: yields partially reversed their decline within 24 hours of the announcement, highlighting the fragility of the initial signal. Bessent<\/strong> nonetheless indicated on August 20 that he could increase the size of the buybacks further, leaving the door open to fresh turbulence in crypto derivatives<\/a><\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For traders active in Bitcoin<\/strong> and futures markets, the lesson is clear: monitoring US Treasury yields<\/strong> as a leading indicator of crypto volatility has become non-negotiable. The inverse correlation between long-term rates and risk appetite was once again confirmed with rare brutality \u2014 and leveraged positions paid a steep price for it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Related articles :<\/h3>\n\n\n\n