{"id":31886,"date":"2026-08-26T15:49:23","date_gmt":"2026-08-26T14:49:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/investx.fr\/en\/2026\/08\/26\/bitcoin-el-salvador-usage-collapse-99-percent\/"},"modified":"2026-08-26T15:49:31","modified_gmt":"2026-08-26T14:49:31","slug":"bitcoin-el-salvador-usage-collapse-99-percent","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/investx.fr\/en\/crypto-news\/bitcoin-el-salvador-usage-collapse-99-percent\/","title":{"rendered":"Bitcoin in El Salvador: Why Usage Has Collapsed by 99.8%"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

El Salvador made history in 2021 by adopting Bitcoin<\/strong> as legal tender. Three years on, real-world usage figures have collapsed in spectacular fashion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Caught between IMF<\/strong> pressure, a national reserve strategy, and growing public disinterest, the Salvadoran experiment is exposing the hard limits of top-down, government-mandated adoption.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But behind the apparent failure of everyday Bitcoin circulation, a different logic is quietly taking shape \u2014 one where HODLing<\/strong> has become official state policy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

An Adoption That Never Truly Materialized on the Ground<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Since Bitcoin was introduced as legal tender in September 2021, daily BTC transactions in El Salvador have plummeted by 99.8%<\/strong>. This figure, drawn from data on the Chivo<\/strong> platform \u2014 the official wallet launched by the Bukele government \u2014 lays bare a gaping divide between political ambition and economic reality on the ground.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

At launch, the government offered every citizen $30 in Bitcoin<\/strong> for signing up to Chivo, generating an artificial spike in activity. Once that incentive ran dry, interest evaporated almost entirely. The vast majority of Salvadorans continued using the US dollar<\/strong> for everyday transactions, held back by a lack of infrastructure, insufficient internet connectivity in rural areas, and above all, deep distrust of Bitcoin<\/a>‘s volatility.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Merchants, theoretically required to accept Bitcoin<\/strong> under threat of penalties, largely ignored the obligation \u2014 and the government never meaningfully enforced it. The result: a legal tender law with no real teeth, and adoption that remains confined to a small, urban, tech-savvy minority.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The IMF, Regulatory Pressure, and Bukele’s Strategic Pivot<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

In January 2025, El Salvador<\/strong> finalized a $1.4 billion loan agreement<\/strong> with the International Monetary Fund<\/strong>. The key condition: stripping Bitcoin of its mandatory legal tender status. The Bukele<\/strong> government agreed, making BTC acceptance voluntary rather than compulsory. A significant symbolic retreat \u2014 but one that did not spell the end of the state’s Bitcoin strategy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In parallel, Bukele<\/a> has reframed the country’s Bitcoin policy as a national reserve strategy<\/strong>. The Salvadoran government continues to accumulate BTC through a regular purchasing program \u2014 often one Bitcoin per day \u2014 and now holds a treasury of several hundred BTC. This approach to institutional HODLing<\/strong> mirrors the strategy adopted by companies like MicroStrategy<\/a>: holding Bitcoin as a reserve asset rather than deploying it as a day-to-day payment tool.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This pivot reflects a reality many observers had long anticipated: Bitcoin works better as a store of value than as a medium of exchange<\/strong> in an environment of high volatility. The monetary velocity of BTC in El Salvador is near zero \u2014 but its value within the national portfolio continues to grow alongside the market price.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What Does the Salvadoran Experiment Leave Behind for the Rest of the World?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The Salvadoran experience stands as a unique case study for economists, regulators, and crypto industry participants alike. It demonstrates that top-down Bitcoin<\/strong> adoption \u2014 imposed by decree without the necessary infrastructure or financial literacy groundwork \u2014 is not enough to create a functioning BTC circular economy. Real monetary adoption takes time, trust, and price stability that Bitcoin simply cannot yet guarantee.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet El Salvador’s legacy is not without merit. The country has attracted thousands of crypto entrepreneurs and investors<\/strong>, developed a dedicated special economic zone for Bitcoin businesses<\/a>, and positioned Bukele<\/strong> as a prominent international figure within the pro-BTC movement. Countries like the Central African Republic<\/strong> have attempted to replicate the model \u2014 with even less success.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The real takeaway: forcing the adoption of a volatile asset as everyday currency in a dollarized, underbanked economy will almost inevitably produce rejection. On the other hand, using that same asset as a tool for sovereign reserve diversification<\/a><\/strong> could prove to be a viable long-term strategy \u2014 provided the price of Bitcoin<\/a> continues trending upward over time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Related articles :<\/h3>\n\n\n\n