{"id":33343,"date":"2026-10-30T18:37:52","date_gmt":"2026-10-30T18:37:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/investx.fr\/en\/2026\/10\/30\/bitcoin-quantum-threat-economic-problem\/"},"modified":"2026-10-30T18:37:58","modified_gmt":"2026-10-30T18:37:58","slug":"bitcoin-quantum-threat-economic-problem","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/investx.fr\/en\/crypto-news\/bitcoin-quantum-threat-economic-problem\/","title":{"rendered":"Bitcoin and the Quantum Threat: A Risk Turning Into a Real Economic Problem"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

The threat of quantum computing<\/strong> to Bitcoin<\/strong> is no longer a science-fiction hypothesis reserved for cryptographers. It has now entered the most serious economic discussions, forcing the ecosystem to consider costly and complex migration scenarios.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Meanwhile, Ripple<\/strong> secures a US banking charter<\/strong>, USDC<\/strong> consolidates its position in Europe, and VanEck<\/strong> adds BTC<\/strong> to a new ETF<\/strong>. A packed week that perfectly illustrates the dual nature of the crypto market: caught between structural risks and institutional expansion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Here is everything you need to know from this week’s crypto news.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Quantum Threat to Bitcoin: When Cryptography Becomes a Market Issue<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

For years, Bitcoin<\/a><\/strong>‘s resilience against quantum computers<\/strong> was treated as a distant, almost theoretical problem. That is no longer the case. Security experts and economists are beginning to quantify the cost of migrating to post-quantum algorithms<\/strong> \u2014 and the figures are staggering.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Bitcoin<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The core of the problem lies in the ECDSA (Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm)<\/strong>, which secures Bitcoin<\/strong> transactions. A sufficiently powerful quantum computer could theoretically break these signatures and compromise exposed wallets \u2014 particularly P2PK addresses<\/strong> where the public key is directly visible on-chain. Estimates suggest that several million dormant BTC<\/strong> could be vulnerable in such a scenario.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The real question is no longer “is it possible?” but “how much time is left?” Advances by Google<\/strong>, IBM<\/strong>, and other players in the field of logical qubits<\/strong> are accelerating the timeline. Migrating to NIST-validated post-quantum standards<\/strong> such as CRYSTALS-Dilithium<\/strong> would require a Bitcoin hard fork<\/strong> \u2014 a process that is both politically and technically explosive for a decentralized network. The cost of inaction could ultimately exceed the cost of migration itself<\/strong>, a trade-off that major institutional holders are beginning to factor into their risk models.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ripple, USDC, VanEck: Institutional Expansion Continues Regardless<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

As the quantum debate intensifies, institutional adoption of crypto is advancing at a steady pace. Ripple has obtained a banking charter in the United States<\/a><\/strong>, a landmark milestone that would allow it to offer regulated financial services directly, without relying on third-party banking partners. For XRP<\/strong> and the broader Ripple<\/strong> ecosystem, this represents a regulatory validation that strengthens the project’s credibility with institutional investors.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

On the stablecoin front, Circle’s USDC<\/strong> continues to gain ground in Europe, driven by the MiCA<\/strong> framework that is progressively coming into force. Unlike Tether’s USDT<\/strong>, USDC<\/strong> benefits from a more transparent reserve structure and a compliance profile better suited to European regulatory requirements \u2014 a decisive competitive advantage in this market.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Finally, VanEck has added Bitcoin to a new ETF<\/strong>, further broadening traditional investors’ exposure to the digital asset. This move confirms that asset managers now view BTC<\/strong> as a legitimate component of a diversified portfolio, on a par with gold or commodities. The convergence between traditional finance<\/strong> and crypto<\/strong> is accelerating, regardless of the long-term technical risks on the horizon.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

What These Signals Reveal About the State of the Crypto Market<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The coexistence of these three developments \u2014 the quantum threat<\/strong>, regulatory expansion<\/strong>, and institutional adoption<\/strong> \u2014 perfectly illustrates the structural tension defining the crypto market in 2025. On one side, fundamental technical risks that could, over time, call into question the cryptographic foundations of Bitcoin<\/a><\/strong>. On the other, an adoption dynamic that is accelerating rapidly, driven by regulated players and mainstream financial products.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

For investors and developers alike, the message is clear: Bitcoin’s long-term resilience will depend as much on its ability to evolve technically as on its institutional adoption<\/strong>. Projects that get ahead of the post-quantum transition<\/strong> \u2014 whether through secure wallets or quantum-resistant protocols \u2014 could represent some of the most strategic opportunities of the coming years. The market is only just beginning to price in this risk.<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Related articles :<\/h3>\n\n\n\n