Two legends predict a catastrophic end for the crypto market

Why is Nouriel Roubini so pessimistic about the future of crypto?

This isn’t the first time Nouriel Roubini has launched a fierce attack on the crypto ecosystem. Historically skeptical, the economist views the majority of digital assets not as currencies or stores of value, but as baseless speculative instruments. His recent media appearance doesn’t predict a simple market correction, but rather a complete systemic collapse.

For “Dr. Doom”, the very structure of the crypto market is unsustainable. He regularly points to the opacity of certain stablecoins, the risks of massive regulation by the SEC and global governments, as well as what he sees as the lack of intrinsic value in Bitcoin. Where investors see an opportunity for a secular bull run, Roubini sees only a bubble ready to burst, leaving retail investors high and dry.

This apocalyptic vision contrasts sharply with current fundamentals. The arrival of institutions through Spot ETFs and the integration of blockchain technology into traditional finance (RWA) seem to validate the opposite thesis. However, Roubini’s voice carries weight, and his warnings of a “catastrophic end” could prompt the weakest hands to panic sell if macroeconomic conditions were to deteriorate.

Michael Burry’s catastrophe scenario: Why the worst may be yet to come?

Michael Burry, the iconic figure from “The Big Short”, doesn’t mince words. According to him, Bitcoin (BTC) isn’t simply in correction, but on the edge of a major financial precipice. While the price has already plummeted nearly 40% from its October highs, Burry believes that an additional drop of just 10% could be the catalyst for a true “death spiral”.

His analysis rests on the fragility of overexposed institutional players. He directly points to companies holding massive amounts of Bitcoin in their treasury, like MicroStrategy, as well as cryptocurrency miners. If BTC’s price were to break its current support levels and plunge toward $68,000, collateral values would collapse, forcing these entities to urgently liquidate their positions to cover losses or avoid bankruptcy.

Burry characterizes Bitcoin as a purely speculative asset, rejecting its status as digital gold or an inflation hedge. For him, the absence of organic use cases to halt the decline is critical. If institutional “whales” are forced to sell, the domino effect could not only crush the crypto market but also contaminate traditional markets, including gold and silver, through a liquidity contagion effect.

Does history vindicate Bitcoin’s detractors?

It’s crucial to put these statements into perspective. Bitcoin has been declared “dead” more than 470 times by mainstream media and traditional economists since its creation. Yet, after each bear cycle, the asset has managed to bounce back and reach a new ATH. Roubini’s predictions, while technically argued, have often run up against the resilience of the crypto community and the law of supply and demand.

For now, the trend remains bearish on Bitcoin and the crypto market. This widespread FUD is often perceived by market veterans as a positive and revealing signal. But will this time be different? We’ll have our answer in the months ahead.

Related Articles:

• Solana: Can a rare $100 buy signal ignite the Bull Run?
• Why is the crypto market surging today? Trump’s $1.2 trillion plan and Bitcoin’s rise
• Stellar and XRP in the Epstein files: What’s the story?