Ledger has recently implemented a $10 fixed fee on its multisig application, sparking criticism within the crypto community. The move by the hardware wallet giant has stirred controversy, fueling discussions on decentralized custody. Explore the ongoing debate surrounding autonomous custody amidst technical advancements and aggressive business strategies.
The most scathing criticism came from Ethereum developer pcaversaccio, who didn’t mince words on X. His accusation strikes at the heart of the crypto ethos: Ledger is allegedly attempting to transform its ecosystem into a mandatory control point for all crypto interactions. This directly contradicts the cypherpunk spirit the company claims to champion.
This position reflects a growing concern within the community: the boundary between self-custody and corporate control is gradually blurring. The fees imposed on multisig functionality, traditionally considered a security standard for significant holders, are perceived as monetizing self-custody itself.
Tension is mounting especially as multisig represents an essential security layer for advanced users, DAOs, and companies managing substantial amounts. Imposing fees on this functionality essentially means taxing security. This concept is difficult to accept in an ecosystem built on censorship resistance and financial independence.
The debate also raises questions about the economic viability of security solutions in the crypto ecosystem. Ledger needs to fund its development and security research, but at what cost to users?
Despite the controversy, Ledger continues its product offensive with the launch of Nano Gen5, its most advanced device to date. The company is undergoing a strategic rebranding, repositioning its devices not merely as hardware wallets but as “Ledger signers.” This reflects their expanded role in securing digital identities in the AI era.
The Nano Gen5 features Bluetooth and NFC connectivity for mobile signing, as well as an E Ink touchscreen enabling clear transaction verification. The Ledger Live application is becoming Ledger Wallet, serving as a central hub for digital asset management. These technical improvements are undeniable and respond to market demand for greater flexibility.
However, the timing of the launch is delicate. Competition is intensifying with Trezor, which just unveiled its Safe 7. Equipped with transparent secure elements and updates resistant to quantum computers. Users dissatisfied with Ledger’s pricing policy might be tempted by alternatives offering similar features without additional fees.
Kaspersky opportunely reminds us that no device can fully protect against phishing or social engineering, the most common threats. This warning underscores that security depends not only on hardware but also on user education.
This controversy goes beyond a simple pricing issue. It crystallizes fundamental tensions about the evolution of crypto infrastructure between security innovation and aggressive commercialization. Users fear the industry may reproduce traditional financial system patterns with opaque fees and unavoidable intermediaries.
The $10 per transaction may seem modest to some, but represents a significant cost for users making frequent or low-value transactions. The 0.05% fee on token transfers adds to existing spreads on DEXs and gas fees, reducing the profitability of operations.
The contradictory documentation and Guillemet’s late clarification have also undermined trust. In a sector where transparency is paramount, these communication errors fuel theories about a deliberate price-testing strategy in the market.
🚀 Position yourself in the market by buying your cryptos on Bitget! Exclusive bonus waiting for you!
On the same topic:
Passionate about cryptocurrencies since 2019, I cover the latest news through clear and accessible articles. My goal is to make crypto understandable for everyone, with reliable and well-researched content.
DISCLAIMER
This article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as investment advice. Trading cryptocurrencies involves risks, and it is important not to invest more than you can afford to lose.
InvestX is not responsible for the quality of the products or services presented on this page and cannot be held liable, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused by the use of any product or service featured in this article. Investments in crypto assets are inherently risky; readers should conduct their own research before taking any action and invest only within their financial means. This article does not constitute investment advice.
Risk Warning : Trading financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies carries a high level of risk, including the possibility of losing all or part of your investment. It may not be suitable for all investors. Cryptocurrency prices are highly volatile and can be influenced by external factors such as financial, regulatory, or political events. Margin trading increases financial risks.
CFDs (Contracts for Difference) are complex instruments with a high risk of rapid capital loss due to leverage. Between 74% and 89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should assess whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Before engaging in financial or cryptocurrency trading, you must be fully informed about the associated risks and fees, carefully evaluate your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk tolerance, and seek professional advice if needed. InvestX.fr and the InvestX application may provide general market commentary, which does not constitute investment advice and should not be interpreted as such. Please consult an independent financial advisor for any investment-related questions. InvestX.fr disclaims any liability for errors, misinvestments, inaccuracies, or omissions and does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information, texts, graphics, links, or other materials provided.
Some of the partners featured on this site may not be regulated in your country. It is your responsibility to verify the compliance of these services with local regulations before using them.
