Toncoin no longer exists under that name. Following a landslide community vote at 81.22%, the network has officially adopted the ticker GRAM, marking a symbolic break from its past and signaling a bold new market ambition. The rebrand has reignited speculation around the token’s price potential over the medium and long term.

With ecosystem momentum driven by Telegram integration and technical signals beginning to stir, GRAM is drawing serious attention from traders and investors hunting for opportunities in layer-1 altcoins. That said, price projections remain widely scattered depending on the scenario.

Here is what the data and on-chain analysis allow us to anticipate for GRAM between 2026 and 2030 — no promises, no hype.

2026: A Confirmed Breakout Could Push GRAM Toward $1.80

The bullish scenario for 2026 hinges on one clear condition: the confirmation of a technical breakout above current resistance levels. If the price structure validates this move on sustained volume, projection models place an initial target around $1.80 by year-end.

This level corresponds to a historical resistance zone identified on the weekly charts. A retest of this threshold as support would confirm entry into a new phase of institutional accumulation — a signal that has historically preceded more significant rallies. Market sentiment around the TON/Telegram ecosystem remains a key fundamental catalyst to watch: the integration of mini-apps and crypto payments within Telegram represents a massive adoption vector, with over 900 million active users on the platform.

On the other hand, if the broader market enters a prolonged correction — driven by monetary tightening or a sector rotation — GRAM could remain compressed between $0.80 and $1.20, stuck in a trendless consolidation zone. The inherent volatility of mid-cap altcoins makes this scenario equally plausible.

2027–2030: Toward $25 If the Ecosystem Delivers

Projections out to 2030 are naturally more speculative, but they are grounded in measurable adoption metrics. If the GRAM ecosystem sustains strong growth in active wallets, on-chain transaction volume, and revenue generated by dApps deployed on the TON blockchain, a price target around $25 becomes defensible under network utility valuation models.

The year 2027 represents a critical intermediate milestone. Analysts place a realistic target between $5 and $8, contingent on the continuation of the post-Bitcoin halving bull cycle and the expansion of DeFi use cases on the TON chain. The protocol’s built-in staking yield and burn mechanisms also play a deflationary role that could support price action over the long run.

For 2028 and 2029, the median scenario projects a gradual progression toward the $10 to $15 range, with potential spikes during market euphoria phases. Reaching $25 by 2030 would require a combination of favorable factors: mainstream adoption via Telegram, integration of GRAM into mainstream payment solutions, and a sustained macro environment supportive of risk assets.

What the Rebrand Actually Changes for GRAM

Beyond the symbolism, the shift from TON to GRAM carries real weight. The name “Gram” was the one originally envisioned by Pavel Durov during Telegram’s 2018 ICO, before the SEC blocked the launch. This return to origins sends a clear signal about the project’s strategic direction: repositioning the token’s identity around its role as the native currency of the Telegram ecosystem, rather than positioning it as just another general-purpose blockchain.

This marketing repositioning could improve the project’s readability for institutional investors and newcomers to the crypto space. A more memorable ticker, a narrative more closely aligned with the token’s actual use case — these elements have a measurable impact on market sentiment and, ultimately, on the liquidity available across major exchanges such as Binance, OKX, and Bybit.

That said, a rebrand alone does not create fundamental value. On-chain metrics — TVL, daily volume, number of active addresses — will need to confirm that real adoption is keeping pace with the narrative. Without these concrete signals, the risk of post-hype disappointment remains very much alive for GRAM holders.