Mantra (OM) Price Plummets by 90% in 24 Hours : What Triggered This Massive Drop ?
MANTRA Collapse: Hack or Rug Pull? On April 13, 2025, MANTRA (OM) plummeted from $6.34 to $0.46 within 24 hours, witnessing a 90% drop, raising questions about...
MANTRA Collapse: Hack or Rug Pull? On April 13, 2025, MANTRA (OM) plummeted from $6.34 to $0.46 within 24 hours, witnessing a 90% drop, raising questions about...
On April 13, 2025, MANTRA (OM) plummeted from $6.34 to $0.46 in 24 hours, a 90% drop that saw its market capitalization plunge from $6 billion to $400 million, according to CoinGecko.
Posts on X are pointing to massive token transfers to exchanges before the crash, fueling rumours of dumping or a rug pull.
Will Sheehan, community lead, denied these accusations, stating that the team is working to clarify the situation without providing immediate details.
Backed by a $108 million fund and a VASP license in Dubai, the RWA project seemed promising. However, the severity of the crash and initial lack of transparency triggered panic, with explosive trading volumes.
Following today’s liquidations, MANTRA addressed the situation on X, reassuring the community that the project’s fundamentals remain strong and clarifying that the team was not behind the activity.
The MANTRA collapse echoes Terra’s (LUNA) crash in 2022, where 99% of the value vanished within days. At that time, the crash was caused by the failure of the algorithmic stablecoin UST. MANTRA, on the other hand, does not rely on such a mechanism. Yet, the dynamics are familiar : sudden panic, cascade selling, domino effect.
According to The Block, the crash originated on Uniswap, following a series of massive swaps. These sales drained liquidity pools, causing an immediate collapse in the OM/USDC pair price.
The high slippage quickly affected prices on CEX (like Binance), where leveraged positions began chain liquidations. The result: a downward spiral fuelled by bots and a market sentiment shift.
On-chain data shows abnormal activity hours before the impact. Token transfers of OM to several exchanges were detected, strengthening suspicions of coordinated dumping.
The team, on the other hand, denied rug pull accusations and stated investigations are ongoing, without revealing details at this time.
A technical rebound is not out of the question, driven by volatility and short-term speculators. However, the core issue remains unresolved: without clear communication, independent audits, or tangible evidence on the crash’s origin, OM remains in a state of maximum uncertainty.
Despite promising fundamentals (RWA, partnerships), dumping allegations weigh heavily. Transparent communication is crucial to restoring trust.
Keep a close eye : on-chain movements and early stabilisation signals, the only tangible indicators to anticipate what’s next.
Léa is a member of the InvestX team, dedicated to guiding users through their learning journey. Passionate about cryptocurrencies, she closely follows market trends. On InvestX.fr, Léa writes articles to help readers decode the latest news and stay informed about the ever-evolving blockchain world.
DISCLAIMER
This article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as investment advice. Trading cryptocurrencies involves risks, and it is important not to invest more than you can afford to lose.
InvestX is not responsible for the quality of the products or services presented on this page and cannot be held liable, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused by the use of any product or service featured in this article. Investments in crypto assets are inherently risky; readers should conduct their own research before taking any action and invest only within their financial means. This article does not constitute investment advice.
Risk Warning : Trading financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies carries a high level of risk, including the possibility of losing all or part of your investment. It may not be suitable for all investors. Cryptocurrency prices are highly volatile and can be influenced by external factors such as financial, regulatory, or political events. Margin trading increases financial risks.
CFDs (Contracts for Difference) are complex instruments with a high risk of rapid capital loss due to leverage. Between 74% and 89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should assess whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Before engaging in financial or cryptocurrency trading, you must be fully informed about the associated risks and fees, carefully evaluate your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk tolerance, and seek professional advice if needed. InvestX.fr and the InvestX application may provide general market commentary, which does not constitute investment advice and should not be interpreted as such. Please consult an independent financial advisor for any investment-related questions. InvestX.fr disclaims any liability for errors, misinvestments, inaccuracies, or omissions and does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information, texts, graphics, links, or other materials provided.
Some of the partners featured on this site may not be regulated in your country. It is your responsibility to verify the compliance of these services with local regulations before using them.