MSTR Crashes 10% and Hits a 2-Year Low: CryptoQuant Urges Strategy to Stop Buying Bitcoin

Strategy (NASDAQ: MSTR) shares plunged more than 10% in a single session, falling back to $92 — their lowest level since March 2024. The culprit: a Bitcoin slide below $60,000, a cascade of liquidations exceeding one billion dollars, and a scathing alert published by CryptoQuant.

The on-chain analytics firm pulls no punches: Strategy has dangerously overextended its balance sheet, its cash reserves are rapidly depleting, and its dividend obligations have quadrupled in less than six months. The model that built Michael Saylor‘s reputation is now turning against him.

Behind the raw numbers lies a complex financial mechanism that is now beginning to seize up. Here is why the situation is far more concerning than it appears.

Bitcoin Below $60,000: A Brutal Day That Brings Strategy to Its Knees

On June 24, 2026, Bitcoin dropped to approximately $59,000, a decline of more than $6,700 in 24 hours — its worst single-day performance in several months. This violent move triggered a wave of forced liquidations across derivatives markets, with $1.1 billion in leveraged positions liquidated within a single day according to CoinGlass data.

For Strategy, the impact was immediate and severe. MSTR opened around $103 before closing at $92, wiping out nearly $11 per share from the previous day. It marks the first time since March 2024 that the stock has fallen below the symbolic $100 threshold. The correlation between MSTR and the Bitcoin price remains near-total — both on the way up and on the way down.

The BTC sell-off has also pushed all of Strategy‘s purchases made throughout 2024, 2025, and 2026 below their average cost basis. The company holds 847,363 bitcoins acquired at an average price of approximately $75,680 per unit. At $59,000, the company’s unrealized losses now stand at $10.6 billion.

CryptoQuant Sounds the Alarm: The Saylor Model Backfires

In a note published the same day, Julio Moreno, Head of Research at CryptoQuant, paints an alarming picture of Strategy‘s financial health. The company’s annual dividend obligations tied to its preferred instruments — STRC, STRK, STRF, STRD, and STRE — have risen from $300 million at the start of 2026 to approximately $1.2 billion today, a fourfold increase in less than six months.

At the same time, cash reserves have declined by 38% since the beginning of the year. Dividend coverage, which previously exceeded seven years, has compressed to approximately 14 months. CryptoQuant is recommending that Strategy rebuild its liquidity to $2.8 billion before considering any further BTC purchases.

A further warning signal is emerging on the preferred stock side. STRC, Strategy’s variable-rate instrument, is trading around $84, well below its par value of $100. When preferred shares trade below par, the capital-raising mechanism that funds Bitcoin purchases begins to break down: the company can no longer issue new instruments on attractive terms.

mNAV Below 1x: Both Funding Taps Cut Off Simultaneously

Strategy‘s model is built on a premium. As long as MSTR trades above the net asset value of its Bitcoin holdings (NAV), the company can issue shares or preferred instruments, use the proceeds to buy more BTC, and mechanically drive up the value per share — a well-documented virtuous cycle.

Today, that cycle has reversed. Strategy‘s mNAV ratio has fallen to approximately 0.80x, meaning the stock is trading at a 20% discount to the value of its Bitcoin holdings. As a result, both financing levers — ordinary share issuance and preferred share issuance — are simultaneously blocked. Issuing equity under these conditions would mean diluting existing shareholders at a price below the intrinsic value of the portfolio.

Strategy now finds itself in a position it has never faced since launching its accumulation strategy: unable to fund new purchases without destroying shareholder value, exposed to mounting dividend obligations, and sitting on a mountain of unrealized losses. The question is no longer whether the model can continue to function under these conditions — but how long the available cash reserves can absorb the shock.