Verus Ethereum bridge hacked: $11 Million stolen in DeFi exploit
The Verus-Ethereum bridge suffered a major hack, resulting in $11 million in losses. Learn about the DeFi exploit and its impact.
The Verus-Ethereum bridge suffered a major hack, resulting in $11 million in losses. Learn about the DeFi exploit and its impact.
Crypto bridge security is once again being called into question. Early this morning, blockchain security firms Blockaid and PeckShield sounded the alarm: the smart contract of the Verus-Ethereum bridge suffered a critical vulnerability. The attacker successfully managed to massively drain the protocol’s reserves, seizing 103.6 tBTC, 1,625 ETH, and 147,000 USDC.
Subsequently, the stolen funds were quickly converted into over 5,400 ETH, worth approximately $11.4 million, before being stored in a single address. Disturbingly, the hacker’s wallet had been funded via Tornado Cash barely 14 hours before the attack began, proving careful premeditation.
Faced with this hemorrhage, the project teams are trying to plug the breach, but the damage is done. This type of hack serves as a stark reminder of how interoperability protocols remain prime targets for cybercriminals. KelpDAO and LayerZero have already paid the price. Ultimately, this also calls into question the structure of the Ethereum blockchain with its numerous L2s, which necessitate these interoperability protocols governed by smart contracts.
This new hack is part of an alarming trend for DeFi security in this month of May 2026. Just three days ago, the renowned THORChain protocol had to suspend trading after one of its liquidity pools was siphoned of $10 million.
According to recent data from PeckShield, exploits linked to crypto bridges have already cost an astronomical $328.6 million since the beginning of the year. These infrastructures concentrate massive volumes of capital while relying on complex code, thereby multiplying attack vectors.
While the market was hoping for a peaceful May, these repeated vulnerabilities are sending a chill through institutional investors. Confidence in cross-chain solutions is eroding, pushing some players to turn toward alternatives deemed safer, to the detriment of the ecosystem’s overall liquidity. The hellish drop of the ZRO token is proof of this. Trust must be regained quickly, and smart contract auditing needs to be overhauled.
Cross-chain bridges are supposed to be the glue of Web3, but they increasingly resemble Achilles’ heels. Every massive exploit raises the same question: is the current technology fundamentally flawed? Developers are struggling to anticipate cryptographic proof manipulations and governance loopholes.
Faced with this reality, the industry could well experience a major crisis in how it approaches interoperability. Native multi-chain protocols or Layer 0 networks could gradually replace these vulnerable bridges, thereby redefining security standards.
With mounting losses and increasingly ingenious hackers, a crucial question arises for traders and liquidity providers. Is it still reasonable to lock cryptocurrencies in DeFi bridges, or are we witnessing the end of an era for these infrastructures?
Because with the rise of AI, hackers have a new asset to further improve their strategies. The conclusion is obvious: audits are not working, while hacks of this caliber only continue to increase.
With this latest incident, May is shaping up to be one of the darkest months in crypto history. Investors are now demanding native interoperability solutions (ZK-bridges) rather than traditional bridges.
Sources:
Related Articles:
Charles Ledoux is a Bitcoin and blockchain technology specialist. A graduate of the Crypto Academy, he has been a Bitcoin miner for over a year. He has written numerous masterclasses to educate newcomers to the industry and has authored over 2,000 articles on cryptocurrency. Now, he aims to share his passion for crypto through his articles for InvestX.
DISCLAIMER
This article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered as investment advice. Trading cryptocurrencies involves risks, and it is important not to invest more than you can afford to lose.
InvestX is not responsible for the quality of the products or services presented on this page and cannot be held liable, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused by the use of any product or service featured in this article. Investments in crypto assets are inherently risky; readers should conduct their own research before taking any action and invest only within their financial means. This article does not constitute investment advice.
Risk Warning : Trading financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies carries a high level of risk, including the possibility of losing all or part of your investment. It may not be suitable for all investors. Cryptocurrency prices are highly volatile and can be influenced by external factors such as financial, regulatory, or political events. Margin trading increases financial risks.
CFDs (Contracts for Difference) are complex instruments with a high risk of rapid capital loss due to leverage. Between 74% and 89% of retail investor accounts lose money when trading CFDs. You should assess whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Before engaging in financial or cryptocurrency trading, you must be fully informed about the associated risks and fees, carefully evaluate your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk tolerance, and seek professional advice if needed. InvestX.fr and the InvestX application may provide general market commentary, which does not constitute investment advice and should not be interpreted as such. Please consult an independent financial advisor for any investment-related questions. InvestX.fr disclaims any liability for errors, misinvestments, inaccuracies, or omissions and does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information, texts, graphics, links, or other materials provided.
Some of the partners featured on this site may not be regulated in your country. It is your responsibility to verify the compliance of these services with local regulations before using them.